Make no mistake about it. If you are a
conservative Christian and Hillary Clinton becomes our next president, she will
declare war on certain aspects of your faith. Your religious liberties will be
targeted, and your biblical beliefs will be branded disturbing, if not
downright dangerous.
Do not be deceived.
She has made herself perfectly clear on this in the recent
past, and we deny this is to our own peril.
Writing for the left-leaning Washington Post, Marc Thiessen,
former chief speechwriter for George W. Bush, declared that “Hillary Clinton is
a threat to religious liberty.”
He began his October 13 column with these two sobering
paragraphs:
“In a speech not long before she launched her 2016
presidential campaign, Hillary Clinton made a stunning declaration of war on
religious Americans. Speaking to the 2015 Women in the World Summit, Clinton
declared that ‘deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural
biases have to be changed.’
“Religious beliefs have to be changed? This is perhaps the
most radical statement against religious liberty ever uttered by someone
seeking the presidency. It is also deeply revealing. Clinton believes that, as
president, it is her job not to respect the views of religious conservatives
but to force them to change their beliefs and bend to her radical agenda
favoring taxpayer-funded abortion on demand.”
Theissen is not overstating the case, and in light of one
recent court case and one pending bill, both in California and both with
potential to go to the Supreme Court, the real dangers of a Hillary Clinton
presidency can hardly be exaggerated.
Last week, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that
pro-life pregnancy centers are required to promote abortion, meaning, that if a
pregnant woman comes to them not knowing what to do about her pregnancy, along
with counseling her about adoption or keeping her own baby, they must also
refer her to a local abortion clinic.
Yes, under the California Reproductive Freedom,
Accountability, Comprehensive Care, and Transparency Act, this is the law, the
Ninth Circuit upheld it.
What an absolute outrage, and what an infringement on
religious liberties, since these pro-life centers, which are invariably run by
conservative Christians, are being forced to violate their sacredly held
beliefs.
Hillary Clinton supports legislation like this, and she
would absolutely appoint Supreme Court justices who would support this as well.
She has made this abundantly, unequivocally clear for many
years, without wavering, and she is the most favored Planned Parenthood
candidate in history.
As I wrote previously, if you vote for Hillary Clinton, you
will have the blood of the unborn on your hands.
And note also the extreme hypocrisy of this ruling, since
abortion clinics are not required to refer their clients to local pro-life
pregnancy centers. They are not even required to show the mother an ultrasound
of her baby, since that would allegedly infringe on her rights.
God forbid that you remind her that she has a baby in her
womb.
In an email announcing the Ninth Court’s ruling, Matt
Bowman, Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel, said, “It’s bad enough if
the government tells you what you can’t say, but a law that tells you what you
must say — under threat of severe punishment — is even more unjust and
dangerous.”
The ADF is considering appealing the ruling, which, as
stated, could ultimately make it to the Supreme Court, but with Hillary as
president, you know how the court will rule.
Do you want to facilitate this by helping to elect her to
the highest office in the land? Do you want to be one of the people who helped
empower her to be president?
Hillary Clinton 2016 Press conference
