Friday, March 27, 2015

Obama's 'jihad against Jews' spills Israel's nuke secrets

White House declassifies details of Middle East democracy's defenses
Bob Unruh March 26,2015

In a move blasted by commentators as part of President Obama’s “jihad against Jews,” the White House has abruptly declassified details of Israel’s nuclear program.

According to Israel National News, the Obama administration declassified a Department of Defense top-secret document with details of Israel’s assets, “a highly covert topic that Israel has never formally announced to avoid a regional nuclear arms race.”

The report said until now, the U.S. has respected that effort by remaining silent.

“But by publishing the declassified document from 1987, the U.S. reportedly breached the silent agreement to keep quiet on Israel’s nuclear powers for the first time ever, detailing the nuclear program in great depth,” the report said.

It openly questioned, “Obama revenge for Netanyahu’s Congress talk,” and other commentators were more direct.

At, started by a former Muslim terrorist turned Christian, was the blunt headline “Obama’s evil revenge on Netanyahu continues.”

Pamela Geller, on her Atlas Shrugs blog, called it “Obama’s jihad against the Jews.”

“Obama is sick, sick with Jew-hatred – unbalanced, unhinged, a danger to this this country, our allies, the world. Israel’s nuclear program, whatever it may be, is purely existential insurance. If they have a nuclear weapon, they have had it for 50 years and have never used it, despite the decades-long Muslim wars against the Jews,” she wrote.


Thursday, March 26, 2015

Gallup CEO: I May ‘Suddenly Disappear’ for Telling Truth

Gallup CEO: I May ‘Suddenly Disappear’ for Telling Truth About Obama Unemployment

Monday February 9, 2015 10:13 AM

The head of the Gallup polling firm recently backpedaled on his claim that the official unemployment rate being trumpeted by the White House, Wall Street and the media is a “big lie.”

Jim Clifton, the Chairman and CEO of Gallup, recently told CNBC that he was worried he might “suddenly disappear” if he disputed the accuracy of what the U.S. government is reporting as unemployed Americans, Wall Street on Parade reported.

“I think that the number that comes out of BLS [Bureau of Labor Statistics] and the Department of Labor is very, very accurate. I need to make that very, very clear so that I don’t suddenly disappear. I need to make it home tonight.”

But he contended that the percent of full time jobs in this country as a percent of the adult population “is the worst it’s been in 30 years.”

His appearance on CNBC came days after he claimed the official unemployment rate being trumpeted by the White House, Wall Street and the media is a “big lie.”

“None of them will tell you this: If you, a family member or anyone is unemployed and has subsequently given up on finding a job - if you are so hopelessly out of work that you’ve stopped looking over the past four weeks - the Department of Labor doesn’t count you as unemployed,” the venerable firm’s chief executive officer and chairman last week wrote in his blog.

“Right now, as many as 30 million Americans are either out of work or severely underemployed. Trust me, the vast majority of them aren’t throwing parties to toast ‘falling’ unemployment.”

Read more at:

Jim Clifton, Chairman and CEO of Gallup

Tuesday, March 24, 2015

Israel: Beware of Obama

By Michael GoodwinMarch 22, 2015 | 12:23am

First he comes for the banks and health care, uses the IRS to go after critics, politicizes the Justice Department, spies on journalists, tries to curb religious freedom, slashes the military, throws open the borders, doubles the debt and nationalizes the Internet.
He lies to the public, ignores the Constitution, inflames race relations and urges Latinos to punish Republican “enemies.” He abandons our ­allies, appeases tyrants, coddles ­adversaries and uses the Crusades as an excuse for inaction as Islamist terrorists slaughter their way across the Mideast.

Now he’s coming for Israel.

Barack Obama’s promise to transform America was too modest. He is transforming the whole world before our eyes. Do you see it yet?

Against the backdrop of the tsunami of trouble he has unleashed, Obama’s pledge to “reassess” America’s relationship with Israel cannot be taken lightly. Already paving the way for an Iranian nuke, he is hinting he’ll also let the other anti-Semites at Turtle Bay have their way. That could mean American support for punitive Security Council resolutions or for Palestinian statehood initiatives. It could mean both, or something worse.

Read the full story at:

Barack Obama - Photo: Getty Images

Thursday, March 19, 2015

Obama: Maybe it's time for mandatory voting

By Holly Yan, CNN
Updated 10:07 AM ET, Thu March 19, 2015

(CNN)The president whose major policy achievement is mandatory health insurance thinks maybe voting should be mandatory, too.

Asked how to offset the influence of big money in politics, President Barack Obama suggested it's time to make voting a requirement.

"Other countries have mandatory voting," Obama said Wednesday in Cleveland, where he spoke about the importance of middle class economics, and was asked about the issue during a town hall.

"It would be transformative if everybody voted -- that would counteract money more than anything," he said, adding it was the first time he had shared the idea publicly.
"The people who tend not to vote are young, they're lower income, they're skewed more heavily towards immigrant groups and minority groups," Obama said. "There's a reason why some folks try to keep them away from the polls."

At least 26 countries have compulsory voting, according to the Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. Failure to vote is punishable by a fine in countries such as Australia and Belgium; if you fail to pay your fine in Belgium, you could go to prison.

[Translated, if the lazy, unemployed welfare recipients and lazy liberals were forced to vote, more liberal Democrats would get elected]

Read more at:

Monday, March 16, 2015



AUSTIN, Texas - March 16,2015 — Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), in an exclusive interview with Breitbart News here at the South By Southwest music and art festival, says former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton “clearly broke the law” by using a private email system. That makes him the first major Republican and potential challenger of hers to say so.

“I think she clearly broke the law,” Paul, a likely 2016 GOP presidential candidate, said.

In fact, she fired one of her ambassadors for not using government email. I think people don’t like hypocrisy. She also has said she did it for convenience because she didn’t want to have two phones—but of course within days she had admitted that she does have two phones. I think convenience, which is her excuse at this point—to carry just one phone—I think that convenience should never trump national security. I think when she says, “oh I never transmitted classified information” the problem is is that her schedule is classified.

She’s going to tell us she never got her schedule emailed to her? The reason it’s classified is to protect her whereabouts. We wouldn’t want enemies to know where our Secretary of State is at all times. But she also doesn’t just put herself at risk by sending these messages on an unsecured server, she also puts at risk the people who defend her and the people who are responsible for her safety if that schedule were to get out to people who want to harm the Secretary of State.

Paul added that it’s unfathomable that no communications Clinton had on the private email address and server were classified—because, among other reasons, she was communicating via email with President Barack Obama himself.

Read the whole story at:

MSNBC photo 2014

Friday, March 13, 2015

Hillary Clinton email scandal is bigger than email

MAR. 12, 2015, 7:33 AM

Hillary Clinton is being bombarded on all sides after her exclusive use of a personal email address while she was secretary of state became public last week. Her belated explanations have not sufficed, and experts on all sides are wondering whether the former first lady and likely 2016 presidential candidate may have jeopardized US interests by using a vulnerable form of communication and deleting many of her emails.

But don't expect all that to stop Hillary, who is treating the flap like many of the events that have defined her political career.

"The Clintons play by their own set of rules. And in this case, the former Secretary of State explained, those rules bless her decision to erase some 30,000 emails from the family server despite knowing that the emails had become a subject of intense interest to congressional investigators," David Von Drehle writes in Time.

"These were merely 'private personal emails,' Clinton averred, 'emails about planning Chelsea's wedding or my mother's funeral arrangements, condolence notes to friends as well as yoga routines, family vacations, the other things you typically find in inboxes.' After she finished taking questions, Clinton's staff disclosed that no one actually read through those 30,000-odd documents before she 'chose not to keep' them."

Time notes that "the twin drivers of the Clinton soap opera" over the past 22 years "have been their penchant for secrecy and their menagerie of rich associates."

AP Photo 2014

Full article at:

My views on Hillary Clinton:
Andrew Shecktor March 13, 2015

This is EXACTLY the problem with America today. Everyone votes for the most important offices 
based on ONE MINOR issue that they want to push. Folks, it is not about women’s rights, gay 
rights, or welfare – it is about the entire economic and cultural future of the United 
States. We need to vote for candidates that respect the law, respect security (both personal 
and political), and who are open and strictly maintain records. The use of personal email for 
ANY business purpose is unethical! I would be fired in a heartbeat from my job if I did 
something that stupid. There is NO excuse for an otherwise intelligent and extremely educated 
individual to be sending business information via personal email. The ONLY reason one would 
do this is to obfuscate information or steal information from their employer. Either way 
Hillary Clinton is a career criminal bent on defrauding the American public – NOT someone we 
want in office. To be fully candid on the matter – Yes, I am a conservative Republican. No, I 
don’t think most of the Republicans in office are any better than the Democrats. I have yet 
to find a viable candidate for the 2017 Presidential elections that I am comfortable voting 
for. And yes, if there should be a Democrat running with a proven track record and better 
qualifications than the opposing Republican, I would vote for the Democrat! In this case, 
Hillary Clinton is NOT even worth thinking about, let alone considering for the nation’s 
highest office!


Wednesday, March 11, 2015

Obama administration temporarily drops ammo ban proposal

By Dr. John R. Lott Jr. Published March 10,

If President Obama can’t have his way with banning guns, it looks like his next option is to ban the bullets used by those guns.  Too often, Obama has shown little regard for the law.  He does what he wants.  If you want him to actually follow the law, you will have to take him to court.

The Obama administration had proposed a ban on one of the most popular and inexpensive bullets for America’s most popular rifle.  A majority of both the House and Senate have spoken out against the ban.  But Tuesday the Obama administration at least temporarily backed off on unilaterally rewriting the laws concerning what bullets can and cannot be sold.

Embarrassingly for Obama it appeared that his administration had jumped the gun on banning the bullets.  The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (BATF) latest "Firearms Regulation Reference Guide," released in January 2015 dropped the 1986 ruling that found the popular ".223 M855 'green tip' ammunition" meet legal requirements.  The change made it appear as if the decision was made before the Obama administration even asked for public comments.

Monday, March 2, 2015

Obama and Netanyahu: A clash of world views, not just personalities

Obama and Netanyahu: A clash of world views, not just personalities
By Stephen Collinson, CNN
Updated 8:53 AM ET, Mon March 2, 2015

Read more at:

Washington (CNN)The disconnect between President Barack Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is about a lot more than bad personal chemistry.

Their relationship, which will be played out in all its dysfunctional glory during Netanyahu's visit to Washington this week, founders on a deep ideological divide and a sharply conflicting world view.

A long, steadily worsening showdown between the rivals is coming to a head in the tense final stages of talks between world powers and Iran in pursuit of a nuclear deal backed by the U.S. but opposed by Netanyahu.
The speech, likely to delight Republicans, who are also trying to thwart Obama's Iran diplomacy, will be the starkest illustration yet of the estrangement between Netanyahu and Obama.